Gender inequity: Title IX was necessary then, but now it's just unfair

Oct 9, 2006, 4:00 PM EDT

by UL

.css-t7o3mc{margin-block:var(--space-around-ad);text-align:center;}@layer recipes{.css-t7o3mc{font-family:var(--chakra-fonts-heading);font-weight:var(--chakra-font-weights-semibold);color:var(--semantics-text-title-primary-color);font-size:var(--chakra-font-sizes-xl);line-height:1.2;}*:where(html[data-theme="teamusa"] .css-t7o3mc){text-transform:uppercase;}*:where(html[data-theme="usopc"] .css-t7o3mc){text-transform:uppercase;}*:where(html[data-theme="ngb"] .css-t7o3mc){text-transform:capitalize;}}To see sponsored ads, please enable JavaScript.

Gender inequity: Title IX was necessary then, but now it's just unfair

Wartburg Jumps to No. 1 in Tournament Poll, Debuts at No. 1 in First Dual Rankings of the Season

NCAA Women's Top 5 Stay Solid Coming Out Of Thanksgiving Holiday

Men's College Notebook: Who takes the annual Cy-Hawk Dual?

No. 4 Oklahoma State gets road win over Arizona State, 25-11

Men’s College Notebook: Early Freshmen Impact, Three Duals To Watch